Friday, November 22, 2013

The Protection of All Life

The Protection of All Life


It can be quite difficult to be Catholic in today's world. The temptation of sin surrounds us with opportunity. I am an understanding person and know that as humans we all have a tendency to sin from time to time. However, there are some sins I simply cannot understand. The two that I place above all others are that of abortion and capital punishment. We see in the political platforms of the two major parties here in the United States a split on each of these issues. The Democrats/Liberals as a majority tend to support abortion and oppose capital punishment and the Republicans/Conservatives as a majority tend to oppose abortion and support capital punishment. I can't help but see a major hypocrisy in both parties.

Looking first at the Democratic platform who support abortion and oppose capital punishment. They claim that until a fetus is “viable” it can be aborted, and in some states even after that. The rationale is that it is part of the woman's body and therefore she may do with it as she wishes. That may be the greatest tragedy of our time. Looking at this logically we take a look at the crime of fetal homicide. There are currently 38 states that have some manner of fetal homicide laws, and of those 23 of them cover any "unborn member of the species Homo sapiens, who is or was carried in the womb of another." to quote the law from my home state of Ohio. (ORC Section 2903.01) Lets look at the words “murder” and “homicide”. According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary murder is defined as “the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another” and homicide as “the deliberate and unlawful killing of one person by another”, as you can see they are synonymous with each other. Approaching these terms from the legal perspective there is a condition of the one being murdered must be human. So with logical reasoning, a person guilty of fetal homicide has murdered a human. So how is it that some form of abortion is still legal in every state? Abortion is defined as “a medical procedure used to end a pregnancy and cause the death of the fetus” They is simply no rationale that can explain this. It is a contradiction of law and logic. How can a person be guilty of fetal homicide and have a legal abortion in the same state? Supporters of abortion like to say that it's not a real person till it's heart beats or till it can be viable without support. That it is just a lump of cells in a woman body. Well last time a checked that “lump” has it's own DNA and meets the requirements of the definition life. I believe that the majority of people who support and have abortions do so out of convenience and selfishness. Women do have a choice. It is whether or not have sex in the first place. Now I'm not asking that the my morals be followed by everyone or that they should be law, but you must live with consequences of your actions. One of the consequences of engaging in sexual activity is the possibility of pregnancy. I would rather see contraceptives used that people engaged in such a travesty as abortion. Again, I am a Catholic and personally I do oppose contraceptives, but the only person that affects is me and my wife. If you want to use them, that is between you and your partner. Abortion on the other hand affects a child who never has a say in the matter. Those who support abortion like to use terms like fetus, embryo, and parasitic lump of cells. I guess it makes them feel better about killing a child, because that is what it is, a child. Your child. When were hear about parents who kill their children in the news and act like we are appalled, yet it happens hundreds of times a day and nothing is ever done. The few who stand against it are called “radicals” or “extremists”. Well I guess I'm a radical too.
Looking at the other half of the Democratic platform, I don't have much to say because I actually agree with it. However, can someone explain to me the logic of fighting to save the life of a convicted criminal, but not the life of the most innocent of innocents? This line of thought is so far beyond logic that it becomes insanity.

The other half of the coin supports exactly the opposite. The Republican platform opposes abortion and yet supports the death penalty/capital punishment. Again we see hypocrisy and absolute lack of logic from politics. The argument that many who oppose abortion like to use is that all life is sacred. They call themselves pro-life, despite that the use of that term and the support of the death penalty weakens their argument. Please understand that I am by no means excusing the acts of criminals. The must serve the punishment for their crime. Again we look at the definition of murder, “the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another”. See that word that got slipped in there? Unlawful. So because we have laws that make it legal to kill someone who is defenseless and poses no immediate threat of danger, it's okay? Abortion is law and yet you claim that is wrong, so how is this any different? We also once had laws that allowed you to own another person, allowed you to beat your wife, or prevented someone from voting because of their gender. All of those have since been changed of course because we realized the inhumanity that they represented. How long will it take till we realize that killing one another robs us of our humanity as well?

The point of this is that until we stop killing people who are defenseless, we will never become the great country that we should be. I do wish to make one caveat, that I can justify the use of force in defense. If you wish to attack or threaten the safety of me or my family I will use the best tool available to protect them. Again that is your choice, but it is also my choice to have a gun. I can live with my choice, can you?



Chris Pierce